首页> 外文OA文献 >O CURSO DE GEOGRAFIA FÍSICA DE IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804): COSMOLOGIA E ESTÉTICA NA CONSTRUÇÃO EPISTEMOLÓGICA DA CIÊNCIA GEOGRÁFICA
【2h】

O CURSO DE GEOGRAFIA FÍSICA DE IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804): COSMOLOGIA E ESTÉTICA NA CONSTRUÇÃO EPISTEMOLÓGICA DA CIÊNCIA GEOGRÁFICA

机译:康曼(IMMANUEL KANT)的自然地理课程(1724-1804):地理科学的认识论建构中的宇宙论和美学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a relative weakness about our knowledge concerning Kant philosophy and the constitution of the modern geography and, consequently, the scientific one. That relation, whenever studied, happens – many times – in an oblique or tangential way, this means that it lies almost exclusively confined in the act of notifying that Kant offered, for approximately four decades, “Physical Geography” courses  in Konigsberg, or, that he was the first philosopher teaching the subject at any College, even before the creation of Geography chair in Berlin, in 1820, by Karl Ritter. Not overcoming the early spread of that act itself only made us throw a curtain over the absence of a major understanding about Kant’s tribute to epistemic justification of modern and scientific geography. To open a breach in this curtain indicates, necessarily, to lighten the role and place of “Physical Geography Course” inside Kantian transcendental philosophy. So, we began from the conjecture that “Physical Geography” has always shown for Kant as a knowledge carrier of an unmeasured philosophic sense, once it showed the possibility of empiricization of his philosophy. Therefore, a “Physical Geography” would be, for Kant, the empiric basis of his philosophic thoughts, because it communicates the empirics of the world invention; it made him to build metaphysically the “Earth’s surface”. In the same way Geography, in its general surface, has given a particular tribute to the empiric validation of Modernity (since the XVI century), the “Physical Geography” introduced itself as an empiric basis to Kantian philosophical reflection about “nature’s metaphysics” and the “world metaphysics” as well. 
机译:我们对康德哲学和现代地理构成以及科学的认识相对较弱。无论何时进行研究,这种关系都会以斜线或切线的方式发生多次,这意味着它几乎完全局限在通知康德在Konigsberg提供大约40年的“自然地理”课程的行为中,或者,他是1820年卡尔·里特(Karl Ritter)在柏林创立地理学系主任之前在任何学院教授该学科的第一位哲学家。没有克服这一行为本身的早期传播,只会使我们对缺乏关于康德对现代科学地理学的认识论辩护的主要理解缺乏了解。揭开这扇窗帘的缝隙,必然意味着要减轻“自然地理课程”在康德先验哲学中的作用和地位。因此,我们从这样一个猜想开始:一旦康德证明了将其哲学化的可能性,“自然地理”就始终表明康德是一种不可估量的哲学意义的知识载体。因此,对康德来说,“自然地理”将是他的哲学思想的经验基础,因为它传达了世界发明的经验。它使他在形而上地构建了“地球表面”。就像地理学在其一般表面上对现代性的经验性验证(自十六世纪以来)特别赞扬一样,“自然地理学”作为对康德哲学关于“自然的形而上学”的哲学反思的经验性基础介绍了自己。以及“世界形而上学”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号